BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Fiorello <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 19:31:18 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
	Hi;
Thanks Mike;
Cushcraft was what I had in mind but wonder if the subconscious was 
working.  Guess I haven't followed these mergers very closely.  I 
believe they also took over amaratron.  Wonder where the cash is coming 
from?  Any thoughts as to whether the quality deteriorated when these 
companies became part of mfj?

richard

On 8/28/2013 6:25 PM, Mike Duke, K5XU wrote:
> Hmmmm.
>
> I think you mean Cushcraft.
>
> That happened 3 or 4 years ago at least.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 2:56 PM
> Subject: mfj and or r9
>
>
> Hi;
> I have had to much computer time I confess.  At any rate
> when did mfj
> absorb witchcraft?  Anyone on this list using the r8 or r9?
> Eham would
> lead one to suspect that quality deteriorated when mfj took
> over but
> that may be just a few folks opinion.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2