BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 16:20:56 -0800
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (65 lines)
It always worked before until the upgrade.  I'll look in the menu and 
see if I can find whre that is.
73
Butch
WA0VJR
Node 3148
Wallace, ks.


On Wed, 23 Dec 2015, Dave Allen wrote:

> Hi Butch!
>
> Yep, sometimes it just don't. Agree with you, that's a great feature when it
> works. On the odd time, it don't and you just want to kill it for all the
> extra time required to bring it back up again.
>
> Just making sure that sleep messages is turned on in the menu is the only
> precaution you can take. Lleep messages are on by default, so in theory, it
> should never be an issue. There's no way I know of to predict when that will
> fail, but just hope for better luck next time. I think it qualifies as a QC
> issue, because it isn't designed to frustrate, so what else you going to
> call it? Hi hi.
>
> Some folks never use the sleep timer, and if they haven't, then they are
> unaware of the bug but anyone who does will recognise the bug. The old one
> had it also. Doesn't seem to matter what you might be listening to. In my
> experience, the frequency is low. Maybe it wouldn't be so annoying if the
> unit booted faster, but I mean, that's exactly the issue that warning is
> intended to prevent, so that takes you full circle. They can't get it up and
> running any faster, I suspect because it's not a very powerful processor,
> but I've been wrong before.
>
>
> I'm not really as impatient as this message implies, but it's a fair
> comment. It probably will boot a bit faster if you never use wireless, but
> then those times are just as rare, hi hi. Maybe, if enough of us mention it
> to Humanware, a fix might find it's way into the next update. Only problem
> with this strategy is I think you need massive numbers to get their
> attention., and the combination of users not using the sleep timer are not
> high enough to get the problem to the mass required, especially with the
> frequency of the problem being as low as this is. I think it only fails
> about once in every ten times, and I may even be exaggerating at that. I
> only know you're not making it up, because it is a shared experience.
>
> 73,
> Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Butch Bussen
> Sent: Wednesday, 23 December 2015 3:42 p.m.
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: another victor stream two question
>
> I don't seem to hear it give the one minute warning for the sleep timer.
> I actually liked that as often I'm not asleep and I just reach over and tap
> the button a couple times.  Anyone else notice that?
> 73
> Butch
> WA0VJR
> Node 3148
> Wallace, ks.
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2