BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jed Barton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:33:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (107 lines)
Hey buddy,

Never heard of this other ht, tell me about it

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Buddy Brannan
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 7:28 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: hand-helds

Hey Colin, have you ever got to play with the Anytone AT-5888UV at all? = (I
haven=92t)
--
Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
Phone: (814) 860-3194 or 888-75-BUDDY



On Aug 27, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I would actually prefer the uv5r at a public service event simply =
because=20
> it's cheap, and if it gets dropped, broken, wet or other wize made to 
> =
be=20
> non-working, your out 40 bucks and not 300.
> The stock battery is also a very good one and will last all day with =
use=20
> such as seen at a public service event.
> It's a very robust little handheld and certainly more suited to =
commercial=20
> or field work than most amateur hand helds.
> It's also fairly light compared to say the th f6a or ict90a.  This is 
> =
a=20
> consideration when you have it hanging on you all day or for those =
times=20
> when you do drop it...it'll tend to bounce rather than crash like 
> the=20=

> heavier kenwood or icom.
> It's as reliable, or perhaps more so, than either the kenwood or =
icom...I=20
> have all 3 so I do speak from experience.
> Actually, if your running close simplex, or are near to a good =
repeater, the=20
> uv3r is my prefered radio...it's very small, rugged and will go all =
day on=20
> the little 3.7V battery at 2 watts.
> Put a shorty antenna on it, and the thing is smaller than your average 
> =
sell=20
> phone.
>=20
> The ict90a and thf6a are certainly more feature packed and have more =
bands=20
> and the wide band receiver etc.  So, if you need all that while =
sitting on=20
> one frequency at some event then I guess it's better.
> The receiver is slightly better in the UV5R than the thf6a.  It's =
prone to=20
> less intermod as well which can be a consideration for pure noise =
purposes=20
> while in the field.
>=20
> I still use my th f6a on occasion, but most of the time, the uv5r is =
my go=20
> to radio for around the house and when I'm out and about.
> I don't use 220, and I certainly don't listen to much outside the 2m =
and=20
> 70cm ham bands on something like a handheld.
> Yes, the kenwood and icom models have HF receive, with ssb on the =
kenwood,=20
> but it's utterly useless with a rubber duck antenna anyway.
> The uv5r has full commercial rx and tx on vhf and UHF, so you've got =
the=20
> option to listen/transmit on gmrs/frs frequencies as well if needed 
> at=20=

> public service events...or on the MURS or whatever.
>=20
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> ----- Original Message -----=20
> From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 12:51 PM
> Subject: hand-helds
>=20
>=20
>> Hi;
>> Just have to ask what if anything does the kenwood thf6a that has =
been
>> very popular offer over these new very low priced hand helds?  For =
some
>> of the prices I've seen it would hardly be worth repairing one.  The 
>> kenwood thf6a is drastically more expensive and not sure what one =
gets
>> for all that cash.  Has to be putting a dent in the sale of handhelds 
>> =
by
>> kenwood icom and yaesu.
>>=20
>> --=20
>> richard=20

ATOM RSS1 RSS2