BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:19:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
I still use qrz and don't find it as bad as everyone else does for some 
reason.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 1:57 PM
Subject: QRZ.com


> Hi, everyone.
>
> I was just looking up a call on qrz.com, and was dismayed to find the 
> search
> function and resultant information for a given call is less accessible 
> than
> it has ever been.
>
> It does not seem as easy to get to the QRZ look-up as it once was, and 
> even
> when there, it is more difficult to access different pieces of information
> for a given call sign.
>
> I know that wm7d has been suggested as another alternative, and may now
> start using that web site exclusively for call sign lookups.
>
> Has anyone had similar recent experience with qrz.com??
>
> I am using Jaws 13 and Windows XP on this particular computer.
>
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2