LISTSERV - BLIND-HAMS Archives - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	BLIND-HAMS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: MFJ 994b auto tuner
From:	Chris Watson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	[log in to unmask]
Date:	Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:15:13 -0800
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (19 lines)

Jim,

I would go for the 998 so you have head room. Remember, the specs are only for 
a true 50 non reactive load. After that, all bets are off.. Just my two cents 
worth.

-- 
Chris 
---
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 01:44:42PM -0800, Jim Gammon wrote:
> Hi list, just wondering if any of you  has experience with the 
> MFJ994B auto tuner? It is like the 998 but only handles 600 watts 
> which works for me.  I got the MP3 manual for the 998 tuner and 
> wonder if reading that would be a waste of time if I am thinking 
> about the 994b.  How blind friendly is the 994b tuner? They also 
> make an interface cable for Kenwood and other rigs.  73, Jim 
> WA6EKS
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG