BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:46:59 -0800
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (27 lines)
I'd suggest the 590 if affordable.  I have both radios and the 590 is a 
better receiver, also dsp is better as the 480 is in the audio section. 
Nothing wrong with a 480, it is a good rig, but 590 is better Both use 
same voice board I think.
73
Butch
WA0VJR
Node 3148
Wallace, ks.


On Sun, 24 Jan 2016, Ron Yearns wrote:

> Hello folks,
> A blind  friend of mine recently upgraded to general and is looking for
> suggestions of which H F Kenwood would be best for him.  I have the 480 but
> some are telling him the 590 or others would work well for him.  he has the
> 71a for 2 meter and 440 so we don't feel a need to duplicate those freqs in
> a base since his wife likely will not permit moving the 2 meter into the
> car.
> What are the suggestions?
> Ron
> KD0HOY .
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2