BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: CEPT, and remote hams question
From:
howard kaufman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Sat, 30 Jan 2016 22:35:21 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines) 
Didn't the FCC and ARRRL opoze repeater operation at first.  Weren't the
loging requirements changed, to accommodate HT repeater operation?


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of David Pearson
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2016 5:01 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: CEPT, and remote hams question

Hi:

The ARRL seems to feel  that in order to "control" an amateur station
governed by the CEPt agreement a ham must be physically present in the
CEPT's qth(country).If this interpretation is correct, this would severely
reduce the # of stations which may be operated by U.S hams via the
RCFORB(client) application.

Any other opinions on this?

Best regards,



David S. Pearson-wa4dsp 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2