BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Dresser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:59:30 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Howard,

I'm curious; what are you running for your AM station?  I've thought about 
setting one up, but haven't quite decided what I want to do.  Ideally, I'd 
like to run something that produces better quality audio than you can get 
from today's typical commercial radios.

Steve

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 10:57
Subject: Re: intro


> No I just can't tollerate intollerant people.  Anything that allows hams 
> to
> communicate with other hams has it's place.  I have worked very hard to be
> able to get on HF, and can cruse along at 30 WPM with ease.  That doesn't
> mean I have to criticize a fellow ham who can use echo-link and check in 
> to
> a repeater in Jerusalem, and share a drive to work with a ham from there.
> You can't do that, no matter how good your HF station is.
> If I am truly tollerant of others I guess I should tollerate their
> intollerence.  I am just not that evolved I guess.  Change?  I am I think
> the only person on this list running Plate modulated AM phone.  I change
> real well.
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2