BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Darrell Shandrow <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:09:59 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (108 lines)
Hi John,

Yep.  My continuing research pretty much tells me that the 817 is probably
out as any sort of usable rig.  Need at least a few knobs to turn, buttons
to push and switches to throw.  Oh, well...  Too bad...  If I wanted always
to use my laptop, then I could probably use the rig under computer control,
but, nah...  Don't think so.

I'm  researching other portable QRP rigs: Icom 703, Elecraft K2, SGC-2020
and Ten Tec Argonaught V.  Anyone have any ideas about any of these?



----- Original Message -----
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: Considering purchase of Yaesu FT817 QRP rig.


> He couldn't do anything with it, tune to a frequency and talk was it, no
> clue where he was on frequency, and you don't really have any reference
like
> you would with a base by what you hear because you don't hear as much,
but
> changing anything, it's all in yaesu's trade mark rocket science menus. He
> didn't like the tuning rate either, I don't know why exactly, but he just
> didn't like anything at all about it as far as really using it goes, it
> wasn't his, but it was a friend's he had for a bit and it really wasn't a
> good situation, maybe he could have learned to like it if he had one for a
> while, but he wouldn't want one, even the IF shift is in a rocket science
> menu, almost everything is.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Darrell Shandrow" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 8:31 PM
> Subject: Re: Considering purchase of Yaesu FT817 QRP rig.
>
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Yes, indeed, I am certainly open to the Elecraft possibility.  I'm not
> sure
> > the K2 was one of their accessible rigs.  I'm digging up that info.
> Buddy,
> > can you tell us if the K2 is as accessible as the rig you reviewed?
> Wasn't
> > that their K1 CW rig?  Anyone who is doing anything to enhance the
> > accessibility of their gear for us blind folks is receiving serious
> > consideration as the radio portion of my little project.
> >
> > What issues did your friend have with the Yaesu that caused him not to
> like
> > it?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 6:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: Considering purchase of Yaesu FT817 QRP rig.
> >
> >
> > > Check out the elecraft kits, you can have some one built them for you,
> I
> > > think you'd like that better, I haven't tried it but I know some one
who
> > has
> > > the yaesu and I really don't think you'll be happy with that at all
from
> > > what my friend says. www.elecraft.com is the elecraft site, check them
> out
> > > and see what you think. If only I had the money I'd consider getting 1
> of
> > > them myself but I just don't have the money right now.
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Darrell Shandrow" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 8:13 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Considering purchase of Yaesu FT817 QRP rig.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi John,
> > > >
> > > > Yes.  I looked at the 703.  Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like it
> would
> > > be
> > > > quite as portable as the FT817, and the power source issue would be
a
> > > > greater concern.  The FT817 has an internal battery as well as the
> > > > capability to take AA cells.  As far as I can tell from my research,
> the
> > > > IC-703 is just a little bit more like a traditional mobile HF rig in
> > these
> > > > areas; there's no mention of having as much ultra-portability.  Some
> of
> > > the
> > > > other attributes of the 703 are a bit nicer; it seems to have a bit
> more
> > > > frequency coverage and power output.  If I'm wrong about the power
> > issue,
> > > > please advise.
> > > >
> >

ATOM RSS1 RSS2