BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Howard Kaufman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 11 Aug 2002 05:20:59 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Hi Tom, I have an II and three III radios.
the II is a better radio for sensitivity and selectivity.  It has better
image rejection from strong stations, and better side rejection.
If you are however listening to a station that is clear on both radios, I
find the III has a fuller more comfortable audio.  They both are just
average on FM.
The III has a wide band AM listening position, which if you plug the radio
into a good system, really shines.

So in summary the II is a better radio if you want to listen to WJR in
Milwaukee in the daytime, but on the other hand, who wants to do that?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2