I don't know how it's done. I was told there is an option to do it. I'll
have to do more checking around.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 7:11 AM
Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
> Russ,
>
> How do you use that connector? I'm guessing that you'd have to inject a
> signal to supply the carrier, or possibly something more complicated.
> Does
> that mean that Ccrane has an accessory for SSB reception?
>
> Steve
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Russ Kiehne" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 09:07
> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>
>
>> From what I understand, the latest cc radio isn't any better than the
>> earlier version. I was also told there is a connection on the back of
>> the
>> cc radio sw for an option to receive ssb.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Patrick Gormley" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 12:22 PM
>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>
>>
>>> the ccradio sw can't receive sideband and I wouldn't recommend it as a
>>> shortwave receiver for that reason. The later model which has the
>>> 2-meter
>>> band replacing the channels 2-13 is a better choice.
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> From: "Russ Kiehne" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 9:57 AM
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>
>>>> Has anyone looked at the CCradio sw? It seems to have very good specs
>>>> on
>>>> am.
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Kris Hickerson" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 8:54 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I agree, Tom. I have both the two and the three, also. I like them
>>>>> both,but the two is far superior to the three in my opinion.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have seen a couple of the C Crane radios and I'm not that impressed.
>>>>> I'll
>>>>> take the super radios over them any day. I think the C Crane are way
>>>>> over
>>>>> priced. When you see what GE was able to do with the two and three
>>>>> for
>>>>> a
>>>>> really reasonable price and, you compare them to the C Crane radios at
>>>>> much
>>>>> higher prices, for me it is not worth it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kris
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 7:23 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, I have a 3 and a 2 here, and will use that 2 until it doesn't
>>>>>> play
>>>>>> any more! (grin)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And, I do think the sound of the 2 is far better than the 3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The base and trebble controls really make a difference on the 2,
>>>>>> while
>>>>>> on
>>>>>> the 3, they are marginal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Lou Kolb" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 2:11 PM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a 3 here. It's ok but from what I understand, the 2 was the
>>>>>> one
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> have. The Secrane radios seem to perform well but I doubt they
>>>>>> sound
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> good as the super radios since they don't have that big case and
>>>>>> speaker.
>>>>>> Lou
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 9:57 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wow, that is really troubling!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 8:29 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It looks the same, but far worse than the GE 3.
>>>>
>>
|
