Our own Jim ke5al makes it.
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Frank Ventura
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 3:49 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Accessible Transceivers
Colin, very interesting can you tell me where I can buy that JJ Radio softw=
are to control a TS2000?
Thanks
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]] =
On Behalf Of Colin McDonald
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 3:36 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Accessible Transceivers
and if you use Jim's JJ radio ts2000 computer program, it gives you all the=
accessibility of the ts590 and more.
73
Colin, V A6BKX
-----Original Message-----=20
From: Steve
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 1:14 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Accessible Transceivers
If it is between the 2000 and the 480, then there's really no contest in =
=3D my opinion. =3D20
The 2000 gives you more features; 6, 2 and 470CM coverage, with about =3D
the same level of accessibility from the voice-chip. =3D20
The 480 has the detachable head, if that matters in a confined space or =3D
if you want to operate mobile, that would give you more room in the =3D
driver's compartment.
Steve
----- Original Message -----=3D20
From: Dustin Thompson=3D20
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 12:34 AM
Subject: Re: Accessible Transceivers
I'm thinking about just saving up and getting either the 2000 or start =
=3D
wit=3D3D
h the 480, and maybe getting the 2000 or maybe even the =3D
590=3D3DE2=3D3D80=3D3DA6 later o=3D3D
n down the road=3D3DE2=3D3D80=3D3DA6
Sent from iPhone=3D3D20
> On Jul 20, 2015, at 11:10 PM, howard kaufman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>=3D3D20
> Well that would give different answers for every question.
> You could argue the basic kx-3 for cost, but not if you need 100 =3D
watts, a
> wider range tuner, 2 meters and 440 MHZ and speech. Each options adds
> =
=3D
to
> the purchase price. The k-3 is similar, but the 100 watt amplifier
> =3D
fits i=3D3D
n
> the same case as the radio, which makes it less portable. The k-3 =3D
does it=3D3D
s
> functions using more hardware, while the k-3 does it all with =3D
software.
> So you see, the answer gets complicated. Its rather like buying a =3D
house,
> what is essential, and what can you compromise on?
> There is no best, the question is what is the best for you?
>=3D3D20
>=3D3D20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators =3D
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]=3D3D
> On Behalf Of Dustin Thompson
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 9:44 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Accessible Transceivers
>=3D3D20
>>> All of the above=3D3D3DE2=3D3D3D80=3D3D3DA6=20
|
