Hello everyone,  I really am working with them directly to do this.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: Man O Man


> Hi Trippy or is it Tricky;
>
> Why don't you just leave accessibility to diplomats.
>
> You are only going to gum up the works and make bad for the rest of us.
>
> 73 de Anthony w2ajv
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon iPhone!
>
> On Mar 21, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Harry Brown <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Butch,
>> I strongly agree with you on this one.
>> People build things with no thought to accessability, no thought at all.
>> Trippy, ac8s
>>  ----- Original Message -----=20
>>  From: Butch Bussen=20
>>  To: [log in to unmask]
>>  Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 5:44 PM
>>  Subject: Re: Man O Man
>>
>>
>>  (If this stuff was  designed from the ground up with accessibility in=20
>>  mind, it could easily be done these days.  Take for example the =
>> digital=20
>>  boxes we all were buying when TV went digital.  A talking chip could=20
>>  have easily and cheaply been added.  The problem with much of this =
>> stuff=20
>>  is no one gives a damn or even thinks of accessibility.  It really has =
>>
>>  nothing to do with entitlement.  Look what Kenwood does with their=20
>>  radios.
>>  73
>>  Butch
>>  WA0VJR
>>  Node 3148
>>  Wallace, ks.
>>
>>
>>  On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Steve wrote:
>>
>>> Yep, one of the byproducts of being such an entitlement society.
>>>
>>> Steve, K8SP
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Ed Malmgren" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 9:31 AM
>>> Subject: Man O Man
>>>
>>>
>>>> I really appreciate getting the service from Bard, Q S T and such =
>> and it is
>>>> always good trying for better but have you noticed, the more we get =
>> the
>>>> more
>>>> we want untill we sometimes are a pain in you know what.  73
>>>>   Ed   K7UC
>>>
>>>