BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Frederick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 2 Apr 2006 19:47:48 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (75 lines)
Hi

    This sounds a little strange but you might try cleaning the latter line. 
I have heard that can be an issue with this type of feed line.

                    God bless,
                    Mark WZ0K
God loves you!
My personal prayer book.
Add your prayer or pray for others at the following link.
http://prayerbook.homewithgod.com/cgi-bin/prayerbook/multi.pl?131961113534708:24:0

http://lists.topica.com/lists/funhamradio.
http://groups.google.com/group/funhamradio-list

http://funhamradio.bloki.com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: antenna problem


> Hi Tom.
>
> Yes, I think that brushing up the R7 to get the corrosion out of the 
> joints
> could make quite a difference.  It's probably a first step in trying to 
> get
> that antenna going.  As for the antenna tuner in the TS850S, if it is
> anything like the auto tuner in the TS450S and TS690S, it is probably a
> pretty tolerant antenna tuner.  I personally think that the AT450 that is
> used in the two radios that I just mentioned is a real gem, and it
> sometimes even outperforms the MFJ993 tuner that I have.  Keep in mind 
> that
> when trying to debug the G5RV, the ladder line cares a lot more about what
> is around it than coax fed antenna systems do, so try to look and see if
> there are any metal objects near it that could be affecting it.  G5RVs 
> work
> best when they are up in the free and clear, but few of us have that 
> luxury.
>
> 73, de Lou K2LKK
>
>
>
> At 12:54 PM 4/2/2006 -0700, you wrote:
>>Thanks for all six of the responses I have received so far. The Kenwood
>>850 has an internal antenna tuner. It worked fine last year  at Handihams
>>radio camp in Malibu.  That was with a G5RV. The R7 is just like it was
>>when I acquired it from the estate of silent key Bob Larson, except for
>>one joint half way up the mast and the 10 radials at the base. Would
>>polishing up the surface do any good or does rf not care? I couldn't use
>>it San Francisco because my lot was only 22 feet wide, but now I have 75
>>by 300 feet. First I'll try the suggestion from two of youto put the twin
>>lead straight and perpendicular to the long line, but at an angle to the
>>ground. I's new and connects directly to the transmitter. I've used two
>>different coax cables on the R7 with identical results. The ground is
>>fine. I could get the G5RV higher if I could figure out what to use as a
>>non-metallic mast. Any ideas?  Would it be worth buying an external
>>antenna tuner to use instead of the internal a t in the K850?
>>Again, thanks for all the quick help. I don't stay on this list because
>>there is too much traffic for me to add to what else is coming through,
>>but it is great to get back on now and then. I'm always available at
>>[log in to unmask]
>>Tom Karnes K6FUN
>>73
>
> Louis Kim Kline
> A.R.S. K2LKK
> Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2