BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
john vernaleken <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 24 Jan 2009 23:11:34 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (94 lines)
I am willing to try again on Sunday.

John  KC2QJB

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Junior Lolley" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: 20 m net


>I would like to try tomorrow if possible.
> Same time same frequency.
>
>
>
> Junior Lolley kg4itd
> Liberty Co. e. c.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Steve Forst
> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 6:24 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 20 m net
>
> I think today was just better for Kevin and we wanted to try a 20 meter 
> net
> with a strong west coast net control  station.  Even with the QRM, he was 
> no
>
> problem for me to copy near Philly.     While I heard  others, the only
> other one  strong enough for me to chat with was Gary in NY.
>
> I could be on tomorrow (Sunday) if anybody  wants to give it a try.
>
> 73, Steve KW3A
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 5:58 PM
> Subject: Re: 20 m net
>
>
>>I thought everyone was going to be on tomorrow, not today, otherwise I'd
>> have been there. Oh well, maybe next time so long as it's on the air. My
>> classes start up again this week but I don't expect to be buried in work
>> the
>> first week, the second one I will but that's only because I need to get a
>> little ahead so I can watch all the Daytona 500 practice and qualifying
>> coverage the week after but I still don't like to work on school work on
>> weekends, Sundays especially.
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Steve Forst" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 5:53 PM
>> Subject: 20 m net
>>
>>
>>> Butch,
>>>
>>> We were on from 2000 until about 2105.    I had said I was going down to
>>> 40,
>>> but only had a short time and put out a few calls, but the bc was nuts.
>>>
>>> Sorry to the list about  that screw-up on my first post.   I had grabbed
>>> the
>>> wrong message to reply to, and even though I  made sure it was going to
>>> the
>>> correct list,  the subject line and original included message were
>>> obviously
>>> wrong.
>>>
>>> Look for some of you on the air next time.  Someone name the date, time
>>> and
>>> freq.
>>>
>>> 73, Steve KW3A
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 5:17 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] What info did you receive with your new tower?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Are you guys still there?
>>>> On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Steve Forst wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Kevin and I are on 14.260 right now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Steve KW3A
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2