BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim Shaffer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jim Shaffer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 31 Aug 2013 15:02:55 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Gee, all this discussion over what's a very relative term!  If you're a 
commercial station, and your pattern doesn't match what the FCC says it 
needs to be, then obviously your antenna isn't working.  But if you're 
content to be able to rag chew with the locals, and you can do that, then 
that random piece of wire hung out your window is working.
--
Jim, KE5AL
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alan R. Downing" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 12:34 PM
Subject: Working or not working


Good morning all,



My point was simply that it is not possible to declare an antenna as working
on the basis of such a limited data set.  There is an awful lot more
involved to just declare some antenna as working just because you were able
to carry on a local QSO, probably thru a repeater at that.



73





Alan R. Downing

Phoenix, AZ

ATOM RSS1 RSS2