BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: icom radios
From:
goshawk <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:19:15 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (110 lines) 
yes, because you did not just ask for it, and then leave it, you had to keep 
on at me all the time.

Simon


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: icom radios


> aggrevation? slander? bullying?
> all because we asked for a call sign?
> wow, someone is insecure.
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 11:56 AM
> Subject: Re: icom radios
>
>
>> I'll have you know, that I had a lot of need to do it, as you just would
> not
>> shut your big gobs, and had to keep giving me aggravation.
>> if you had just put a sock in it, I wouldn't have done it, so you asked
> for
>> it plane and simple, as I am not prepared to keep putting up with that, 
>> so
>> if you want it to stop, I will with pleasure, when you lot stop giving me
>> aggravation, spreading slander about me, and bullying me, it is as easy 
>> as
>> that.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 6:35 PM
>> Subject: Re: icom radios
>>
>>
>> > you didn't have any need to do what you did, it was uncalled for and
>> > proved
>> > once and for all the truth. If in fact you are a real license holder of
>> > any
>> > kind, you're a disgrace to it.
>> > ----- Original Message ----- 
>> > From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
>> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:23 PM
>> > Subject: Re: icom radios
>> >
>> >
>> >> you lot asked for it in the first place, by giving me all the
> aggravation
>> >> you did, so don't start whining about it now, as if you hadn't started
>> >> giving it in the first place, I would have had no need to do what I
> did,
>> >> you
>> >> lot drove me to it as well you know.
>> >>
>> >> Simon
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> >> From: "Jim Johnson" <[log in to unmask]>
>> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:23 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: icom radios
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> agreed!!
>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> >>> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
>> >>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:50 AM
>> >>> Subject: Re: icom radios
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> To the moderator, please get Simon off this list!  Enough is
>> >>>> enough.  That language alone is enough reason!
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -- 
>> >>>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> >>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> >>>> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/450 - Release Date:
>> >>>> 9/18/2006
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -- 
>> >>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> >>>> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/450 - Release Date:
>> >>>> 9/18/2006
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2