Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 4 Dec 1999 10:59:30 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mag and Anee,
A most sensible assessment.
I would only add that a wheelchair, by law, is a "reasonable
accommodation." The cost of "normal" wear and tear, including that from
the wheelchair, should be absorbed by the landlord. This is a
University facility and service. Anee has already articulated their
enlightenment and support regarding disability. The issue of collateral
damage by wheelchair seems assumed by the University. If Anee does sign
a lease the matter can be spelled out to her satisfaction.
I applaud Anee's Dad's concern for his daughter and her prospective
landlord, a useful parental role model regarding respect for property
rights and ownership. I also sense the good man may be a tad
oversensitive or overly concerned. Probably parental anxiety clothed in
rationality.
Steve M.
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 21:46:29 EST
From: Magenta Raine <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> >
Subject: Re:
anee,
wear and tear on carpet is a given in apartment life. in the lease it
should allude to that fact. i wouldn't worry about it.
mag
|
|
|