The "disappointed" reviewer keyed in on a quote
                     “Fat provides this
                     source of energy by breaking down into glucose. Because
                     this breakdown occurs only as
                     needed, the body avoids the effects of high levels of
                     blood sugar (diabetes), as well as extreme
                     fluctuations in sugar levels (hypoglycemia).”
as factually wrong and a reason for not recommending the book
(basically not biochemically correct). I'm certainly no
expert, so
I was wondering specifically about a rebuttal of this. I didn't
follow much of anything else said.


On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 16:44:43 -0800, Mary <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>I think "Disappointed" works for the AMA or the FDA!!
>
>If everyone went on paleo, drs revenue would go WAY DOWN.
>
>>I would be interested to see a rebuttal of the objections in the
>>"Diaappointed" review (just before my review :-)
>>
>>