Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 18:58:40 PST |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>O There is no reason whatsoever to hurt an infant by
> > cutting
> > off the foreskin. Think what that must do psychologically to a
> > helpless
> > infant. They do feel the pain.
Although I agree that automatically circumcise infants is useless, I think
it's not a reason to condone the procedure altogether.
4 men in my family were not circumcised at birth, and then suffered from
infections much later (2 in their teens, one in his thirties, and one at 54)
I doubt all this was caused by a general lack of proper hygiene!
They all had to be circumcised when the problems appeared. Although I wonder
if this was the only way to go, I cannot deny that it rapidly corrected the
ailments.
As for the pain, being circumcised at 54 probably hurts equally, if not
more, than doing it while being a baby (if you add the various discomfort of
not having sex and being way more active than a babe).
Lilith
............
........................
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
|
|
|