Halifa,
     Given that there are two alternative choices in changing a government,
either through a democractic process or an act of revolution, is there any
possibility that we could effect political transformation and change within
our constitutional framework?

   The reason I asked this question, is the fact that I have become
increasingly convinced, that genuine change and development resides at the
core of what a constitution mandates, and the people who are elected to
represent the dictates of such a mandate.

   It is therefore necessary, that the provisions of a constitution overrides
any individual or group motivations, and is embedded in the true interest of
a nation that survives all political maneuverings.

   For one reason or another, people who are desperate for political change,
and do not have the perseverance, the sincerity and the commitment to effect
constitutional changes or work within the parameters of what is provided for
within a constitution, most often end up advocating for a violent change to a
repressive government, or create the conditions that make one possible. Only
to realize that you can change governments, but not necessarily the
conditions that gave rise to the change of that government in the first place.

   I, therefore want to surmise, that change and genuine change for that
matter, is rooted in a passionate quest for what is right, noble and humane.
Since a democratic ideal presupposes that people's interest, hopes and
dreams, are articulated through representation, it is fundamental that those
who represent the people uphold their interest as supreme.

   If we are convinced that we can change the political process
constitutionally, we should make our constitution such that ultimate power
and its dispensation lies with the people and those whom they elect to
represent them. These representatives should be able to dispense with such
responsibilities freely, irrespective of party affiliation, and should be
guided only by their conscience and what is in the national interest. They
should have the prerogative to either support or against their party's
positions on national issues, and should do so as a matter of principle and
at the behest of their conscience.

    With respect to the economy, and all the reviews that has been made, some
of which are quite disheartening, is it within our constitutional purview to
set up an independent council of economic advisors? This council, in my
opinion, can work in tandem with the ministry of economic affairs in the
formulation of economic policies as well as budgetary issues.

     Is it also within our constitutional setting, that members of
parliament, either singularly or in committees, can sponsor alternative
policies, budgets, or other national policy issues for consideration by the
house, as a substitute for that which the government proposes?

    Greeting,
                    Rene Badjan

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------------