Hi All,
The end of this article is excellent. It is high time that Bill Gates
start being taken to task for his public claims to care about
accessibility. I applaud the article author and Mr. Nielson for having the
wisdom to raise the issue of accessibility When the promotional web site
for his book fails to use something as simple as an HTML alt-tag, which
makes navigation for those of us who are blind much easier, one has to
wonder if accessibility is something Gates even understands. It is more
than just the words one speaks, it is the actions one performs that matters.
Microsoft apologists will say that this is something separate from their
efforts on accessibility but time and again I've read where Bill Gates
claims to have all this interest and concern for people with disabilities.
Well you can bet that Gates or a representative of his signed off on this
web site and they signed off on it not following standard and accepted
practice of accessible web design.
Kelly
>Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 08:39:02 -0800 (PST)
>From: Scott Luebking <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: An article from LA Times
>
>Hi,
>There's an interesting quote at the end of this article by Jakob Nielson
>who's is a luminary in the CHI world.
>Scott
>
>Gates' Efforts as Management Guru Misfire in New Book
>By LESLIE HELM, Times Staff Writer
>
>
>If Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates played technology visionary in his 1995
>bestseller, "The Road Ahead," in his latest book he takes on a new role
>as management guru.
>
>Since Gates is arguably the richest, most successful executive ever,
>businesspeople around the world will no doubt pick up "Business @ the
>Speed of Thought" (Warner Books) to hear his advice.
>
>The book is built around Gates' notion of the "digital nervous system,"
>the corporate equivalent of a human nervous system. Gates argues that
>the system, built of networked computers, should enable a company "to
>perceive and react to its environment, to sense competitor challenges
>and customer needs and to organize timely responses."
>
>It's an apt metaphor, and Gates is right when he argues that companies
>must do a better job of getting a proper return from the hundreds of
>billions of dollars spent on computer technology.
>
>Only by collecting the correct information and distributing it broadly
>throughout the corporation, he argues, can employees have access to the
>data they need to make specific proposals to improve performance.
>
>The nervous system must also pass bad news up the management chain.
>Offering rare insight into his dogged attention to detail, Gates says he
>is suspicious when he gets e-mail about some sales victory.
>
>"I've found there's a psychological impulse in people to send good news
>when there's bad news brewing," Gates writes.
>
>But Gates' push for management guru status comes just as Microsoft is
>making a major push to sell the profitable database and networking
>software that are core components of any digital nervous system.
>Although details of Microsoft's offerings are in the appendix rather
>than the body of the book, the book nevertheless often reads like very
>sophisticated promotional material.
>
>Gates writes, for example, about how he was blind to the early
>importance of the Internet. In 1993, Microsoft's Internet site was three
>computers on a folding table, with duct tape holding electric cords in
>place, which a fire marshal tried to shut down as a hazard.
>
>An e-mail campaign by a few Internet enthusiasts in the company created
>a "firestorm of electronic deliberation" that finally resulted in
>Microsoft's dramatic commitment to the Net in 1995. E-mail, Gates
>suggests, was the critical catalyst.
>
>But in "Competing on Internet Time," scholars Michael Cusumano and David
>Yoffie argue that Microsoft's real success came from identifying
>Netscape Communications as a threat, copying and improving its browser
>technology, then using all the marketing power Microsoft had at its
>disposal to crush the company.
>
>Gates' tendency to place so much importance on digital sources of
>information is particularly ironic, given his own focus on the
>importance of face-to-face meetings, the reason he insists on keeping
>most of his employees in physical proximity on the Redmond, Wash.,
>campus.
>
>When Gates advises readers to "stay in the mainstream" so they can
>benefit from $15 billion in research and development by personal
>computer makers, that too seems self-serving. He never touches on Linux,
>a sophisticated operating system that is available for free and may be a
>potential competitor to Microsoft's Windows, or Java, a software system
>that is popular among large corporations because it allows software to
>be written that can run on multiple computers, not just those sold by
>Microsoft.
>
>Business readers will find useful Gates' descriptions of the practical
>ways in which Microsoft has used technology to solve its business tasks.
>A system that allows distributors to place orders electronically for
>Microsoft products has reduced errors in the process from 75% to zero
>and now handles $3.4 billion in business. Virtually all paper forms,
>whether for ordering supplies or hiring new employees, have been
>replaced with electronic processes.
>
>Such digital systems can vastly increase efficiency. They can also be
>impersonal. In describing an electronic system for handling temporary
>workers, Gates talks about dealing with "invoices" from "vendors" of
>temp labor and designing a system to cut off the temp's access to "the
>network, e-mail, phone and buildings" on the worker's "termination
>date." Such attitudes have contributed to dissatisfaction among temp
>workers, who have filed two separate lawsuits regarding their treatment.
>
>A digital nervous system that only looks at the impact on a company's
>bottom line risks missing bigger trends. Gates misjudged the widespread
>anger over Microsoft's tactics that led to the Justice Department's
>damaging antitrust suit.
>
>Gates' vaunted digital nervous system missed another important detail.
>While Gates boasts of putting special features in Microsoft's browser
>that helps the disabled, the Web site for his book
>(http://www.speed-of-thought.com) leaves out simple code that would
>allow people who are blind or have poor eyesight to use special systems
>that either increase the size of the text on the page or convert it to
>voice.
>
>"If Gates is trying to propose a new way of running business
>electronically," says Jakob Nielson, an expert in software usability,
>"he shouldn't act like he can't be bothered with people who are blind or
>have reduced eyesight."
>
>
>
VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
To join or leave the list, send a message to
[log in to unmask] In the body of the message, simply type
"subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/vicug-l.html
|
