Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 22 Aug 2004 14:50:23 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
yes, some children are not as sensitive as others, but what responsible
parent would want to take the risk? i've studied enough health research over
the last 12 years and observed enough children with allergies and the food
history their parents told me to say I have drawn a legitimate conclusion.
However, you're entitled to your opinion if it really gives you peace of
mind to hold onto it, but I still have to disagree. I think the thourough
health studies are much more convinncing. Sue
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darlene Vanasco" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 1:04 AM
Subject: Re: leaky gut
> I am sorry, but I must respectfully disagree as the
> mother of one anaphylactic child, and one non-allergic
> child, raised, breastfed and table fed in/with the
> same environment/schedule.
> If what you say is true, then my daughter should have
> developed allergies to say, egg, at 1 year, when my
> son did. Because it was "too soon".
> There is no "age" typical. What is correct for one
> child is not necessarily correct for another child.
> There is no formula or test for measuring such.
> I also would add that some children are given cow's
> milk practically from birth (with completely immature
> guts) and develop no allergies, so I think the issue
> is far more complex with many unknown variables than
> when a food is introduced.
> It would be nice however to be able to pin it on one thing.
>
>
>
> _______________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush
|
|
|