Well I don't want to belabor this point any more ....none of us want any one
to die trying to rid us of this cancer .....my point was, there were more
substantive issues on that piece to focus on .....Ebrima already made it
clear that he was disguising his source ....obviously, he would not narrow
it down to the extent that even people like yaya can identify the source
...let us device a way of bringing yaya to justice ....you are right ...they
are capable of murdering innocent people ....but they would only do so if
they think they can get away with it.

>From: Prince Obrien-Coker <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: The Gambia and related-issues mailing list
><[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Up-date no.6
>Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 21:00:12 +0200
>
>Yes Kebba, they can kill all perm sects. Is that what you want? More kids
>were slaughtered by Jammeh's diabolical regime, than there are Perm Sects.
>It is nothing to these people to 'eradicate' anybody they feel is against
>them. Some of us can put our necks on block on this List but it will be
>irresponsible to sacrifice a reliable source at home. Think about that.
>
>Prince Coker
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Dampha Kebba
>   To: [log in to unmask]
>   Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 8:12 PM
>   Subject: Re: Up-date no.6
>
>
>   This is exactly the kind of things which brought us to the situation
>where
>   we are right now .....instead of focussing on the substantive issues in
>the
>   piece you are worried about a witch hunt ...what can they do next????
>kill
>   all the perm. sects.
>
>   >From: latjor ndow <[log in to unmask]>
>   >Reply-To: The Gambia and related-issues mailing list
>   ><[log in to unmask]>
>   >To: [log in to unmask]
>   >Subject: Re: Up-date no.6
>   >Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 10:17:38 PDT
>   >
>   >Ebrima, you wrote:
>   >
>   >>>
>   >>>Signed: "An honest Permanent Secretary".
>   >>>
>   >
>   >There are only a handful of Perm. Secs. To avoid a witch hunt, perhaps
>it
>   >would be better to just post comments from your sources without being
>to
>   >overt about it. People can formulate their own opinions on their
>viewpoints
>   >based on their merits. This way they are not inadvertently sacrificed.
>I
>   >understand you are trying to give legitimacy of your sources, but at
>this
>   >point, perhaps this journalistic instinct ought to be surpressed a bit.
>   >Latjor
>   >______________________________________________________
>   >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>   >
>
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   >
>   >To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the
>Gambia-L
>   >Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
>   >
>
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>   ______________________________________________________
>   Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>   To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the
>Gambia-L
>   Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------------