On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Met History wrote:
> No, I don't prefer the demolition - I like seeing the building where it is.
> And as my post stated, I don't necessarily disagree with Landmark
> designation. Simply asking the question about how we would "protect" this
> building doesn't indicate opposition to that protection - or does it?
My apologies -- I misunderstood. I just now reread your original post and
I see now how I misread it.
---
Lawrence Kestenbaum, [log in to unmask]
The Political Graveyard, http://politicalgraveyard.com