BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim Hicks <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - "Is this the list with all the ivy haters?"
Date:
Sun, 9 Jan 2000 09:36:54 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (514 lines)
JIM HICKS thought this item from the The Nation Magazine would be of interest to you.

For more articles like the one you're about to read, visit The Nation website at http://www.thenation.com. Featuring editorials, essays, news and views as well as special subscription offers to The Nation, this site is the place to go for provocative, hard-hitting reporting you can't find anywhere else.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------


FORD AND THE F&UUML;HRER


New
Documents Reveal the Close Ties
Between Dearborn and the Nazis

by KEN SILVERSTEIN


We have sworn to you once,
But now we make our allegiance permanent. Like
currents in a torrent lost,
We all flow into you.
Even when we cannot understand
you,
We will go with you.
One day we may comprehend,
How you can see our
future.

Hearts like bronze shields,
We have placed around you,
And it seems
to us, that only
You can reveal God's world to us.

This poem ran in an
in-house magazine published by Ford Motor Company's German subsidiary in
April of 1940. Titled "F&uuml;hrer," the poem appeared at a time when Ford
maintained complete control of the German company and two of its top executives
sat on the subsidiary's board. It was also a time when the object of Schumann's
affection was in the process of overrunning Western Europe after already
having swallowed up Austria, Czechoslovakia and Poland in the East.

I found
"F&uuml;hrer" among thousands of pages of documents compiled by the Washington
law firm of Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, which sought damages from
Ford on behalf of a Russian woman who toiled as a slave laborer at its German
plant. This past September, a judge in New Jersey, Joseph Greenaway Jr.,
threw the case out on the grounds that the statute of limitations had expired.
Greenaway, who did not exonerate Ford, did accept the company's argument
that "redressing the tragedies of that period has been--and should continue
to be--a nation-to-nation, government-to-government concern."

Ford argues
that company headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan, lost control of its German
plant after the United States entered the war in 1941. Hence, Ford is not
responsible for any actions taken by its German subsidiary during World
War II. "We did not do business in Germany during the war," says Lydia Cisaruk,
a Ford spokeswoman. "The Nazis confiscated the plant there and we lost all
contact." She added that Ford played a "pivotal role in the American war
effort. After the United States entered the war, Ford threw its entire backing
to the war effort."

That Ford and a number of other American firms--including
General Motors and Chase Manhattan--worked with the Nazis has been previously
disclosed. So, too, has Henry Ford's role as a leader of the America First
Committee, which sought to keep the United States out of World War II. However,
the new materials, most of which were found at the National Archives, are
far more damning than earlier revelations. They show, among other things,
that up until Pearl Harbor, Dearborn made huge revenues by producing war
mat&eacute;riel for the Reich and that the man it selected to run its German
subsidiary was an enthusiastic backer of Hitler. German Ford served as an
"arsenal of Nazism" with the consent of headquarters in Dearborn, says a
US Army report prepared in 1945.

Moreover, Ford's cooperation with the
Nazis continued until at least August 1942--eight months after the United
States entered the war--through its properties in Vichy France. Indeed,
a secret wartime report prepared by the US Treasury Department concluded
that the Ford family sought to further its business interests by encouraging
Ford of France executives to work with German officials overseeing the occupation.
"There would seem to be at least a tacit acceptance by [Henry Ford's son]
Mr. Edsel Ford of the reliance...on the known neutrality of the Ford family
as a basis of receipt of favors from the German Reich," it says.
* * *
The new information about Ford's World War II role comes at a time of growing
attention to corporate collaboration with the Third Reich. In 1998 Swiss
banks reached a settlement with Holocaust survivors and agreed to pay $1.25
billion. That set the stage for a host of new Holocaust-related revelations
as well as legal claims stemming from such issues as looted art and unpaid
insurance benefits. This past November NBC News reported that Chase Manhattan's
French branch froze Jewish accounts at the request of German occupation
authorities. Chase's Paris branch manager, Carlos Niedermann, worked closely
with German officials and approved loans to finance war production for the
Nazi Army. In Germany the government and about fifty firms that employed
slave and forced labor during World War II--including Bayer, BMW, Volkswagen
and Daimler-Chrysler--reached agreement in mid-December to establish a $5.1
billion fund to pay victims. Opel, General Motors' German subsidiary, announced
it would contribute to the fund. (As reported last year in the Washington
Post, an FBI report from 1941 quoted James Mooney, GM's director of overseas
operations, as saying he would refuse to do anything that might "make Hitler
mad.") Ford refused to participate in the settlement talks, though its collaboration
with the Third Reich was egregious and extensive. Ford's director of global
operations, Jim Vella, said in a statement, "Because Ford did not do business
in Germany during the war--our Cologne plant was confiscated by the Nazi
government--it would be inappropriate for Ford to participate in such a
fund."

The generous treatment allotted Ford Motor by the Nazi regime is
partially attributable to the violent anti-Semitism of the company's founder,
Henry Ford. His pamphlet The International Jew: The World's Foremost Problem
brought him to the attention of a former German Army corporal named Adolf
Hitler, who in 1923 became chairman of the fledgling Nazi Party. When Ford
was considering a run for the presidency that year, Hitler told the Chicago
Tribune, "I wish that I could send some of my shock troops to Chicago and
other big American cities to help." (The story comes from Charles Higham's
Trading With the Enemy, which details American business collaboration with
the Nazis.) In Mein Kampf, written two years later, Hitler singled Ford
out for praise. "It is Jews who govern the stock exchange forces of the
American Union," he wrote. "Every year makes them more and more the controlling
masters of the producers in a nation of one hundred and twenty millions;
only a single great man, Ford, to their fury, still maintains full independence."
In 1938, long after the vicious character of Hitler's government had become
clear, Ford accepted the Grand Cross of the German Eagle, the Nazi regime's
highest honor for foreigners.
* * *

Ford Motor set up shop in Germany in
1925, when it opened an office in Berlin. Six years later, it built a large
plant in Cologne, which became its headquarters in the country. Ford of
Germany prospered during the Nazi years, especially with the economic boom
brought on by World War II. Sales increased by more than half between 1938
and 1943, and, according to a US government report found at the National
Archives, the value of the German subsidiary more than doubled during the
course of the war.

Ford eagerly collaborated with the Nazis, which greatly
enhanced its business prospects and at the same time helped Hitler prepare
for war (and after the 1939 invasion of Poland, conduct it). In the mid-thirties,
Dearborn helped boost German Ford's profits by placing orders with the Cologne
plant for direct delivery to Ford plants in Latin America and Japan. In
1936, as a means of preserving the Reich's foreign reserves, the Nazi government
blocked the German subsidiary from buying needed raw materials. Ford headquarters
in Dearborn responded--just as the Nazis hoped it would--by shipping rubber
and other materials to Cologne in exchange for German-made parts. The Nazi
government took a 25 percent cut out of the imported raw materials and gave
them to other manufacturers, an arrangement approved by Dearborn.
 According
to the US Army report of 1945, prepared by Henry Schneider, German Ford
began producing vehicles of a strictly military nature for the Reich even
before the war began. The company also established a war plant ready for
mobilization day in a "'safe' zone" near Berlin, a step taken, according
to Schneider, "with the...approval of Dearborn." Following Hitler's 1939
invasion of Poland, which set off World War II, German Ford became one of
the largest suppliers of vehicles to the Wehrmacht (the German Army). Papers
found at the National Archives show that the company was selling to the
SS and the police as well. By 1941 Ford of Germany had stopped manufacturing
passenger vehicles and was devoting its entire production capacity to military
trucks. That May the leader of the Nazi Party in Cologne sent a letter to
the plant thanking its leaders for helping "assure us victory in the present
[war] struggle" and for demonstrating the willingness to "cooperate in the
establishment of an exemplary social state."

Ford vehicles were crucial
to the revolutionary Nazi military strategy of blitzkrieg. Of the 350,000
trucks used by the motorized German Army as of 1942, roughly one-third were
Ford-made. The Schneider report states that when American troops reached
the European theater, "Ford trucks prominently present in the supply lines
of the Wehrmacht were understandably an unpleasant sight to men in our Army."
Indeed, the Cologne plant proved to be so important to the Reich's war effort
that the Allies bombed it on several occasions. A secret 1944 US Air Force
"Target Information Sheet" on the factory said that for the previous five
years it had been "geared for war production on a high level."

While Ford
Motor enthusiastically worked for the Reich, the company initially resisted
calls from President Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Churchill to increase
war production for the Allies. The Nazi government was grateful for that
stance, as acknowledged in a letter from Heinrich Albert to Charles Sorenson,
a top executive in Dearborn. Albert had been a lawyer for German Ford since
at least 1927, a director since 1930 and, according to the Treasury report,
part of a German espionage ring operating in the United States during World
War I. "The 'Dementi' of Mr. Henry Ford concerning war orders for Great
Britain has greatly helped us," Albert wrote in July of 1940, shortly after
the fall of France, when England appeared to be on the verge of collapse
before the F&uuml;hrer's troops.

Ford's energetic cooperation with the
Third Reich did not prevent the company's competitors from seeking to tarnish
it by calling attention to its non-German ownership. Ford responded by appointing
a majority-German board of directors for the Cologne plant, upon which it
bestowed the politically correct Aryan name of Ford Werke. In March of 1941,
Ford issued new stock in the Cologne plant and sold it exclusively to Germans,
thereby reducing Dearborn's share to 52 percent.

At the time, the Nazi
government's Ministry of Economy debated whether the opportunity afforded
by the capital increase should be taken to demand a German majority at Ford
Werke. The Ministry "gave up the idea"--this according to a 1942 statement
prepared by a Ford Werke executive--in part because "there could be no doubt
about the complete incorporation, as regards personnel, organization and
production system, of Ford Werke into the German national economy, in particular,
into the German armaments industry." Beyond that, Albert argued in a letter
to the Reich Commission for Enemy Property, the abolition of the American
majority would eliminate "the importance of the company for the obtaining
of raw materials," as well as "insight into American production and sales
methods."
* * *

As 1941 progressed, the board of Ford Werke fretted that
the United States would enter the war in support of Britain and the government
would confiscate the Cologne plant. To prevent such an outcome, the Cologne
management wrote to the Reich Commission that year to say that it "question[ed]
whether Ford must be treated as enemy property" even in the event of a US
declaration of war on Germany. "Ford has become a purely German company
and has taken over all obligations so successfully that the American majority
shareholder, independent of the favorable political views of Henry Ford,
in some periods actually contributed to the development of German industry,"
Cologne argued on June 18, 1941, only six months before the bombing of Pearl
Harbor.

In May of 1942, the Superior Court of Cologne finally put Ford
Werke in "trusteeship," ruling that it was "under authoritative enemy influence."
However, the Nazis never nationalized Ford's German property--plant managers
feared it would be turned over to Mercedes or the Hermann Goering Werke,
a huge industrial network composed of properties seized by the Reich--and
Dearborn maintained its 52 percent share through the duration of the war.
Ford Werke even set aside dividend payments due to Dearborn, which were
paid after the war. Ford claims that it received only $60,000 in dividend
payments. It's not possible to independently verify that--or anything else
regarding Dearborn's wartime economic relationship with Cologne--because
Ford of America was privately held until 1956, and the company will not
make available its balance sheets from the period.

Labor shortages caused
by the war--millions of men were at the front and Nazi ideology was violently
opposed to the idea of women working--led the Reich to deport millions of
people from occupied lands to Germany to work in factories. German companies
were encouraged to bid for forced laborers in order to meet production quotas
and increase profits. By 1943 half of Ford Werke's work force comprised
foreign captives, including French, Russians, Ukrainians and Belgians. In
August of 1944 a squad of SS men brought fifteen prisoners from the Buchenwald
concentration camp to Ford Werke. The German researcher Karola Fings, co-author
of Working for the Enemy, a book on Nazi slave- and forced-labor programs,
to be published this spring, says Ford's worker-inmates toiled for twelve
hours a day with a fifteen-minute break. They were given 200 grams of bread
and coffee for breakfast, no lunch and a dinner of spinach and three potatoes
or soup made of turnip leaves.
* * *

An account by Robert Schmidt, the
man appointed to run Ford Werke in 1939, states that the company used forced
laborers even before the Nazis put the plant in trusteeship. His statement,
sent to a Ford executive in England immediately after Germany's surrender,
says that as of 1940 "many of our employees were called to the colours and
had to be replaced by whatever was available.... The same applies to 1941.
Some 200 French prisoners of war were employed." In a statement to the US
Army in 1945, Schmidt said that the Gestapo began to play an important role
at Ford Werke after the first foreign workers arrived. With the assistance
of W.M. Buchwald, a Ford employee since the mid-thirties, the Gestapo carefully
monitored plant activities. "Whenever there was the slightest indication
of anti-Nazi feeling, be it amongst foreigners or Germans, the Gestapo tramped
down as hard as possible," Schmidt told the Army.

Meanwhile, Ford Werke
offered enthusiastic political support for Hitler as well. The fraternal
ties between Ford and the Nazis is perhaps best symbolized by the company's
birthday gift to the F&uuml;hrer of 35,000 Reichsmarks in April of 1939.
Ford Werke's in-house publication couldn't have been more fanatically pro-Nazi
if Josef Goebbels had edited it. "F&uuml;hrer," the poem printed at the
top of this story, ran in the April 1940 issue, which celebrated Hitler's
51st birthday by running his picture on the cover. The issue carried an
excerpt of a speech by Hitler in which he declared that "by natural law
of the earth, we are the supreme race and thus destined to rule." In another
section of the speech, the F&uuml;hrer declared that communism was "second
in wretchedness only to Judaism." The issue from April of the following
year--this at roughly the high point of the Third Reich's military victories--featured
a photograph of a beaming Hitler visiting with German soldiers on the front
lines. "The management of the Ford-Werke salutes our F&uuml;hrer with grateful
heart, honesty, and allegiance, and--as before--pledges to cooperate in
his life's work: achieving honor, liberty and happiness for Greater Germany
and, indeed, for all peoples of Europe," reads the caption.

Robert Schmidt
so successfully converted the plant to a war footing that the Nazi regime
gave him the title of Wehrwirtschaftsf&uuml;hrer, or Military Economic Leader.
The Nazis also put Schmidt in charge of overseeing Ford plants in occupied
Belgium, Holland and Vichy France. At one point, he and another Cologne
executive bitterly argued over who would run Ford of England when Hitler's
troops conquered Britain.

Schmidt's personal contributions to Ford Werke's
in-house organ reflect his ardently pro-Nazi views. "At the beginning of
this year we vowed to give our best and utmost for final victory, in unshakable
faithfulness to our F&uuml;hrer," he wrote in December of 1941, the same
month as Pearl Harbor. "Today we say with pride that we succeeded if not
in reaching all our goals, nevertheless in contributing to a considerable
extent in providing the necessary transportation for our troops at the front."
The following March, Schmidt penned an article in which he declared, "It
depends upon our work whether the front can be supplied with its necessities....
therefore, we too are soldiers of the Fuhrer."
* * *

The Ford family and
company executives in Dearborn repeatedly congratulated the management of
Ford Werke on the fine work they were doing under the Nazis. In October
of 1940 Edsel Ford wrote to Heinrich Albert to say how pleased he was that
the company's plants in occupied lands were continuing to operate. "It is
fortunate that Mr. Schmidt is in such authority as to be able to bring out
these arrangements," said Edsel, who died of cancer during the war. The
same letter indicates that Ford was quite prepared to do business with the
Nazis if Hitler won the war. Though it was difficult to foresee what would
happen after the fighting ended, Edsel told Albert, "a general rearrangement
of the ownership of our continental businesses may be required. You will
no doubt keep as close to this subject as possible and we will have the
benefit of your thoughts and suggestions at the proper time."

"To know
that you appreciate our efforts in your and the company's interests is certainly
a great encouragement," Albert replied the following month. He went on to
praise Schmidt, who had been forced to shoulder immense responsibilities
after war broke out. "In fulfilling his task his personality has grown in
a way which is almost astonishing." Indeed, Schmidt grew to such a great
degree that the Nazis kept him in charge of Ford Werke after they put the
company in trusteeship. In February of 1942, when the question of who would
run the Cologne plant was still up in the air, a local Nazi official wrote
to Hitler's Chancellery in Berlin to put in a good word for Ford's man.
The official said he saw "no reason to appoint a special custodian for the
enterprise" since Schmidt was "a Party member [who] enjoys my confidence
and...the confidence of the German Armed Forces."
* * *

Ford's behavior
in France following the German occupation of June 1940 illustrates even
more grotesquely its collaborationist posture. As soon as the smoke had
cleared, Ford's local managers cut a deal with the occupation authorities
that allowed the company to resume production swiftly--"solely for the benefit
of Germany and the countries under its [rule]," according to a US Treasury
Department document. The report, triggered by the government's concern that
Ford was trading with the enemy, is sharply critical of Maurice Dollfus,
a Ford director in France since 1929 and the company's manager during the
Vichy period. "Mr. Dollfus was required by law to replace directors, and
he selected the new directors exclusively from the ranks of prominent collaborationists,"
says the Treasury report. "Mr. Dollfus did this deliberately to curry favor
with the authorities." The report refers to another Ford employee, a certain
Amable Roger Messis, as "100% pro-German."

The Treasury Department found
that Ford headquarters in Dearborn was in regular contact with its properties
in Vichy France. In one letter, penned shortly after France's surrender,
Dollfus assured Dearborn that "we will benefit from the main fact of being
a member of the Ford family which entitles us to better treatment from our
German colleagues who have shown clearly their wish to protect the Ford
interest as much as they can." A Ford executive in Michigan wrote back,
"We are pleased to learn from your letter...that our organization is going
along, and the victors are so tolerant in their treatment. It looks as though
we still might have a business that we can carry on in spite of all the
difficulties."

The Ford family encouraged Dollfus to work closely with
the German authorities. On this score, Dollfus needed little prodding. "In
order to safeguard our interests--and I am here talking in a very broad
way--I have been to Berlin and have seen General von Schell himself," he
wrote in a typed note to Edsel in August of 1940. "My interview with him
has been by all means satisfactory, and the attitude you have taken together
with your father of strict neutrality has been an invaluable asset for the
protection of your companies in Europe." (In a handwritten note in the margin,
Dollfus bragged that he was "the first Frenchman to go to Berlin.") The
following month Dollfus complained about a shortage of dollars in occupied
France. This was a problem, however, that might be merely temporary. "As
you know," he wrote Dearborn at the time, "our [monetary] standard has been
replaced by another standard which--in my opinion--is a draft on the future,
not only in France and Europe but, maybe, in the world." In another letter
to Edsel, this one written in late November of 1940, Dollfus said he wanted
to "outline the importance attached by high officials to respect the desires
and maintain the good will of 'Ford'--and by 'Ford' I mean your father,
yourself and the Ford Motor Company, Dearborn."

All this was to the immense
satisfaction of the Ford family. In October of 1940, Edsel wrote to Dollfus
to say he was "delighted to hear you are making progress.... Fully realize
great handicap you are working under." Three months later he wrote again
to say that Ford headquarters was "very proud of the record that you and
your associates have made in building the company up to its first great
position under such circumstances."

Dearborn maintained its communication
with Ford of France well after the United States entered the war. In late
January of 1942, Dollfus informed Dearborn that Ford's operations had the
highest production level of all French manufacturers and, as summed up by
the Treasury report, that he was "still relying on the French government
to preserve the interests of American stockholders."

During the following
months, Dollfus wrote to Edsel several times to report on damages suffered
by the French plant during bombing runs by the Royal Air Force. In his reply,
Edsel expressed relief that American newspapers that ran pictures of a burning
Ford factory did not identify it as a company property. On July 17, 1942,
Edsel wrote again to say that he had shown Dollfus's most recent letter
to his father and to Dearborn executive Sorenson. "They both join me in
sending best wishes for you and your staff, and the hope that you will continue
to carry on the good work that you are doing," he said.

As in Germany,
Ford's policy of sleeping with the Nazis proved to be a highly lucrative
approach. Ford of France had never been very profitable in peacetime--it
had paid out only one dividend in its history--but its service to the Third
Reich soon pushed it comfortably into the black. Dollfus once wrote to Dearborn
to boast about this happy turn of events, adding that the company's "prestige
in France has increased considerably and is now greater than it was before
the war."
* * *

Treasury Department officials were clearly aghast at Ford's
activities. An employee named Randolph Paul sent the report to Secretary
Henry Morgenthau with a note that stated, "The increased activity of the
French Ford subsidiaries on behalf of the Germans received the commendation
of the Ford family in America." Morgenthau soon replied, "If we can legally
and ethically do it, I would like to turn over the information in connection
with the Ford Motor Company to Senator [Harry] Truman."

Lydia Cisaruk,
the Ford spokeswoman, says that Ford Werke's pre-Pearl Harbor support for
the Third Reich was largely unknown to company headquarters. Neither of
the two Dearborn executives on Ford Werke's board, Edsel Ford and Charles
Sorenson, attended board meetings after 1938. "By 1940, Dearborn was becoming
less and less involved in day-to-day operations," she says. "There was a
gradual loss of control." Asked about Ford Werke's political support for
the Nazis, as seen in its in-house newsletter, she replied: "Looking at
the years leading up to the war, no one could foresee what was going to
happen. A number of countries were negotiating with Germany and Germany
was repeatedly saying that it was interested in peaceful solutions. The
United States was talking to Germany until the two countries went to war."
She concedes that some "foreign" labor was employed at the plant beginning
in 1940, but says Dearborn had no knowledge of that at the time. Ford is
currently conducting an exhaustive investigation into Ford Werke, she says.
When the research is completed this year, the company will make available
all of the documentary evidence it has accumulated, including financial
records. While Ford did not take part in the German slave-labor talks, Cisaruk
says it is in preliminary discussions with Deputy Treasury Secretary Stuart
Eizenstat to establish a humanitarian US-based fund for Holocaust survivors.
"We do want to help people who suffered at the hands of the Nazis," she
says.
* * *

Production at Ford Werke slowed at the end of the war, in part
because of power shortages caused by Allied bombing runs, but activity never
came to a halt. Soon after Germany's capitulation, Ford representatives
from England and the United States traveled to Cologne to inspect the plant
and plan for the future. In 1948 Henry Ford visited Cologne to celebrate
the 10,000th truck to roll off the postwar assembly line there. Two years
later, Ford of Germany rehired Schmidt--who had been arrested and briefly
held by US troops at the war's end--after he wrote a letter to Dearborn
in which he insisted that he had fervently hated the Nazis. He was one of
six key executives from the Nazi era who moved back into important positions
at Ford after 1945. "After the war, Ford did not just reassume control of
a factory, but it also took over the factory's history," says historian
Fings. "Apparently no one at Ford was interested in casting light upon this
part of history, not even to explicitly proclaim a distance from the practices
of Ford Werke during the Nazi era." Schmidt remained with Ford until his
death in 1962.

The high point of Ford's cynicism was yet to come. Before
its fall, the Nazi regime had given Ford Werke about $104,000 in compensation
for damages caused by Allied bombings (Ford also got money for bombing damages
from the Vichy government). Dearborn was not satisfied with that amount.
In 1965 Ford went before the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the
US to ask for an additional $7 million. (During the hearings, commission
attorney Zvonko Rode pointed to the embarrassing fact--which Ford's attorney
did not dispute--that most of the manufactured products destroyed during
the bombings had been intended for the use of the Nazi armed forces.) In
the end, the commission awarded the company $1.1 million--but only after
determining that Ford had used a fraudulent exchange rate to jack up the
size of the alleged damages. The commission also found that Dearborn had
sought compensation for merchandise that had been destroyed by flooding.
Ford's eagerness to be compensated for damages incurred to Ford Werke during
the Nazi era makes its current posture of denying any association with the
wartime plant all the more hypocritical. These new revelations may force
Ford to reconsider its responsibilities with regard to slave labor. In the
meantime, new legal developments could also create problems for the company.
Last year California passed a law that extends the statute of limitations
on Holocaust-related claims. In November Senator Charles Schumer of New
York introduced a bill in Congress that would do the same thing at the federal level.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ken
Silverstein is a Washington, DC-based writer. His book Private Warriors,
which examines post-cold war military and arms-dealing networks, will be
published this spring by Verso. Research assistance provided by the Investigative Fund of The Nation Institute.



------------------------------------------------------------------------

Send your letter to the editor to [log in to unmask]

Copyright ©  The Nation Company, L.P. All rights reserved. Unauthorized
redistribution is prohibited.

If you liked what you just read, you can subscribe to The Nation by calling
1-800-333-8536 or by following this link. The Nation encourages activists
and friends of the magazine to share our articles with others. However, it
is mandatory that academic institutions, publications and for-profit
institutions seeking to reprint material for redistribution contact us for
complete guidelines.

Please attach this notice in its entirety when copying or redistributing
material from The Nation. For further information regarding reprinting and
syndication, please call The Nation at (212) 209-5426 or e-mail
[log in to unmask]

------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2