Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEOFOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEOFOOD Home PALEOFOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re heart size and pulse (#2000-49)
From:
"S.B. Feldman" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Jan 2000 08:21:02 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
In a message dated 1/21/00 7:51:03 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<< The problem here is that you are assuming that "saving beats" is
 a good thing, as if each heart has an allotment of beats, and you
 are using yours up more slowly.  As far as I know there is no
 evidence for any such thing,
.1..This is true, I agree.

 however.  The slower heartbeat is a
 consequence of the heart having become enlarged from much aerobic
 work.

..2..The enlargement is not a cosequence of aerobics; the slower heartbeat or
pulse rate reflects greater efficiency

  But the size of a heart is not an indicator of its health. >>

.3...an enlarged heart is not a sign of health but a sign of disease.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV