PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 07:18:40 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<003601bf5729$115c4ac0$36dc868b@ben>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (19 lines)
On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Ben Balzer wrote:

> This chlorine is not absorbed, but normal Chloride ion can be harmful- the
> chloride in salt is harmful, not just the sodium.  I quote Loren Cordain:
> "As you may know its not just the Na ion, but the
> accompanying Cloride ion which also wreaks havoc via its acidifying effect.

As I understand it, Ben, no chloride ion is liberated when
sucralose is ingested, again because the body's sucrase enzyme
cannot initiate the breakdown of the disaccharide.  It has been a
while since I looked into this (purely academic interest, since
I've never used splenda), so maybe you have some more recent
information that supersedes it.  As I understand it, the altered
sucrose leaves the body intact; the maltodextrin "filler" is of
course digested as usual.

Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2