Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 13 Dec 1998 22:45:09 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Well, one *could* skim the fat from sea lion's milk... :-)
(But where does one get such an exotic drink?)
*-*-*-*-*-*-*
G. V. Palazzolo
*-*-*-*-*-*-*
On Sun, 13 Dec 1998, Steve Carper wrote:
> Amanda Ackerman is quite correct. All lactose, from whatever =
>
> source, is identical. However, according to my records, the =
>
> lactose content in cow's milk varies considerably, from 3.7-5.1%, =
>
> thus overlapping the lactose content of goat's milk,
> which is from 4.1-4.7%. =
>
>
> There is no easily attainable milk that is low enough in lactose
> to make a difference, and the really low lactose milks =
>
> (sea lion, eg) have so high fat as to be unpalatable.
>
> For a long list of the lactose percentages in the milks of various =
>
> animals, see the Lactose Zoo page in my web site, Steve Carper's =
>
> Lactose Intolerance Clearinghouse.
>
> Steve Carper
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/stevecarper/zoo.htm
>
|
|
|