When it comes to self, food and health, I am the only study that counts
anymore.  Eliminate questionable foods for a period of two months and then
add back, one at a time and watch for negative reaction.  It was interesting
for me to note that all the non-paleo foods caused negative reactions.
Some nuts I added back, some I didn't.  Peanuts are a no, as are cashews.
No, I still haven't tried raw meat/fish.........  Oh groan........ Oliva,

-----Original Message-----

>On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Wally Day wrote:
>
>> I think we have to measure foods that
>> may be considered paleo with the same yardstick we
>> measure everything else. If a food ain't good for you
>> - it ain't good for you.
>
>I agree.  The problem is that it's not always a simple matter to
>use that yardstick.  Do we trust epidemiological studies?
>Clinical trials?  Case studies?  Field studies?
>
>Todd
>