I don't mean to directly disagree, but from everything I have heard, Windows
2000 runs MUCH BETTER on an AMD than an Intel chip.  Personally, I would
prefer an AMD Win2k server.

Kyle

----- Original Message -----
From: "niki foord" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: [PCBUILD] Win 2000 and AMD K62


> Mark,  an AMD K2 400 with 128 megs of P-100 too.   I have been informed by
> several specialist for MS products that it's not about the chip per se,
> it's a problem that Win2000 is an NT product and will be quite
incompatible
> with most WIN9x software.  There is supposed to be a WIN9x release called
> Millineum or something like that to be released sometime this fall (or
> later by a MS clock <g>).  My advice would be to wait for the WIN9x new
> release later this year.
>
> At 08:35 PM 2/23/2000 , you wrote:
> >I have a FIC P2007 with  AMD K62 400 with a 128 megs of P-100 that I want
> >to turn into a Windows 2000 File..NAT...Talkworks message
> >center...Print...FTP Server.
> >
> >Are there any issues with AMD chip sets and AMD CPUs and Win 2000 ?
> >
> >m

                Curious about the people moderating your
                   messages? Visit our staff web site:
                     http://nospin.com/pc/staff.html