PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bruce Sherrod <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 29 Oct 1999 02:15:55 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
>Yes, absolutely! When I first read the article is
>really p***ed me off. How can something that is, in
>reality, the ANTITHESIS of a fad be lumped into the
>fad diet category?

From WordNet v1.6:

fad
   n : an interest followed with exaggerated zeal: "he always
       follows the latest fads"; "it was all the rage that
       season" [syn: {craze}, {furor}, {furore}, {cult}, {rage}]

Considering the zeal in William's reply, and the high level
of traffic of this mailing list, it sure sounds like a fad to me.

I thought the site wasn't very negative towards the "caveman diet",
just kind of silly.  They certainly didn't provide any evidence
of nutritional lack.

--Bruce
p.s.  Are sunchokes paleo?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2