> I have no problem with you or anyone else adopting
> your own
> criteria,

I'm not, really. I think we have to measure foods that
may be considered paleo with the same yardstick we
measure everything else. If a food ain't good for you
- it ain't good for you.

> Nuts are clearly
> paleo, but we have some people here saying that we
> shouldn't eat
> them because they contain anti-nutrients.

So, instead you're saying that some dairy MAY be paleo
even though most on this list would agree that dairy
is a definite no-no?

>
> > There is ample evidence that dairy in
> > general, as well as grains and beans, should be
> > avoided even if we COULD consider them paleo.
>
> If that is correct then we must abandon the premise
> that paleo
> foods are the best foods, right?

Not at all. What I'm saying is whether or not a food
is paleo should be the starting point. You're nuts
analogy proves this out.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com