VICUG-L Archives

Visually Impaired Computer Users' Group List

VICUG-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
"VICUG-L: Visually Impaired Computer Users' Group List" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Scott Hendershot <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Sep 1999 14:18:47 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Reply-To:
Scott Hendershot <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (282 lines)
 saw this and it sounded kind of interesting so I thought others would like
to hear too.  I got this from:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Peter_Meijer/im
agery.htm
Its really cooll if you ask me.

Sound-Induced Mental Imagery for the Blind

« The vOICe Home Page
Visual imagery may be loosely defined as visual mental processing that
resembles 
the perceptual mental processing normally induced by the eyes, but now
occurring 
in the absence of direct sensory stimuli from the eyes. In my definition this 
visual mental processing may be characterized by certain (conscious,
subjective) 
experiences, but also by vision-related cognitive processes and
representations 
in the brain that are not, or not directly, accessible to consciousness. 
            The vOICe for mental imagery: seeing with your ears.
            
 Visual imagery encompasses (the visual aspects of) dreaming, visual memory, 
(cognitive) imagination, and any visual mental (re)constructions involved
in the 
latest information-rich sensory substitution technology for the blind.
In the literature, the term mental imagery is often used almost as an alias
for 
visual imagery due to the attention given to vision, although strictly
speaking 
one should reserve the mental imagery term for more general use, including, 
e.g., auditory imagination, imagining sounds. On the other hand, with sensory 
substitution for the blind the internal mental representations may be, but
need 
not be, truly visual in terms of quasi-pictorial or "screen-like" internal 
representations, so to leave this issue open it may be better to speak of
mental 
imagery rather than just visual imagery here. Therefore, we will mainly use
the 
mental imagery term from now on, although we use and apply it only in the 
context of vision and vision substitution.
Note that with sensory substitution for the blind the mental processing and 
experience will in fact be much less subjective than with most of the other 
forms of mental imagery, because it is again bound rather directly and
tightly 
to sensory input, though not from the eyes this time, but from a substituting 
auditory display or a tactile (haptic) display. The imagery content is set 
mainly by the alternative sensory input and less directly by conscious
control - 
although one can of course focus attention to parts of the perception or of
any 
corresponding short term sensory memory (sensory buffer) as well as control 
where the alternate input device is being "pointed at".
The topic and concept of mental imagery has been much discussed and debated
in 
the literature, but so far mainly in a philosophical and psychological
setting. 
This makes that although some publications do address the meaning of mental 
imagery to, for instance, the congenitally blind (e.g., John Kennedy), 
surprisingly little has been published about the relevant mental imagery 
questions as now posed by new technology options for substituting one sensory 
stream by another. This is most unfortunate, because state-of-the-art vision 
substitution technology, based on camera or sonar sensor input and auditory
or 
tactile display output, poses very concrete and socially relevant questions 
about (the limitations of) mental imagery, and the alternate sensory
induction 
thereof, questions that should be leading to significant follow-up in 
psychological theory, prediction and experiment. See also the SIGGRAPH 98
panel 
presentation on this topic.
Historically, part of the debate on mental imagery has circled around the 
behaviorist criticism on the non-provable existence of subjective experiences 
(e.g., Watson). With modern brain-scanning techniques like PET and fMRI,
which 
show increasingly reliable correlates between the subjective and the
objective, 
this fundamental scientific criticism starts to lose ground. Another source
of 
much debate has been the concept of quasi-pictorial or "screen-like" visual 
imagery as a (conscious) experience, "versus" or supplemented by the
underlying 
(partly non-conscious) visual processing and representation needed to do the 
coding or decoding (notably Stephen Kosslyn). It seems likely that
neuroscience 
will help disentangle these issues in the forthcoming years, and help clarify 
which ideas and categories turn out to be mainly conceptual artefacts of
culture 
and philosophy, and which ideas can be demonstrated to have a locatable
neural 
substrate. For instance, the relations and distinctions between short term 
visual memory (iconic memory) and spatial processing with its working
memory (as 
used in navigation) are currently subject to intensive neuroscientific
research.
The vOICe vision substitution technology, as presented on this web site, is 
about a proposed new mental imagery approach via sound-induced
visualisation or 
"perceptualization", for which real-time hardware has been developed, as
well as 
a multimodal Java applet demonstrator and fully integrated video sonification 
software in the form of The vOICe Learning Edition. Having been developed
as an 
experimental system for auditory image representations, it is intended as a
step 
towards a vision substitution device for the blind. Presently, The vOICe
offers 
a first order approach consistent with basic psychophysical knowledge about
the 
human hearing system, while containing a sufficiently large set of
parameters to 
allow for much of the subsequent second order fine-tuning for improved 
perceptual performance as more knowledge about human auditory processing and 
perception becomes available. See also the auditory model page. The big
question 
in the context of mental imagery is to what extent The vOICe approach can
indeed 
be used to replace regular vision via sound-induced mental imagery.

Sound-induced mental imagery of visual information 
Literature on The vOICe approach: Meijer, P.B.L., ``An Experimental System
for 
Auditory Image Representations,'' IEEE Transactions on Biomedical
Engineering, 
Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 112-121, Feb 1992. Reprinted in the 1993 IMIA Yearbook of 
Medical Informatics, pp. 291-300. Electronic version of full paper available 
on-line. 

A good entry point to mental imagery and its history in science, including
many 
references, is the web site of Nigel Thomas on Mental Imagery, Consciousness, 
and Cognition. For more information on The vOICe technology, visit The vOICe 
Home Page. 
Copyright © 1996 - 1999 Peter B.L. Meijer

 saw this and it sounded kind of interesting so I thought others would like
to hear too.  I got this from:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Peter_Meijer/im
agery.htm
Its really cooll if you ask me.

Sound-Induced Mental Imagery for the Blind

« The vOICe Home Page
Visual imagery may be loosely defined as visual mental processing that
resembles 
the perceptual mental processing normally induced by the eyes, but now
occurring 
in the absence of direct sensory stimuli from the eyes. In my definition this 
visual mental processing may be characterized by certain (conscious,
subjective) 
experiences, but also by vision-related cognitive processes and
representations 
in the brain that are not, or not directly, accessible to consciousness. 
            The vOICe for mental imagery: seeing with your ears.
            
 Visual imagery encompasses (the visual aspects of) dreaming, visual memory, 
(cognitive) imagination, and any visual mental (re)constructions involved
in the 
latest information-rich sensory substitution technology for the blind.
In the literature, the term mental imagery is often used almost as an alias
for 
visual imagery due to the attention given to vision, although strictly
speaking 
one should reserve the mental imagery term for more general use, including, 
e.g., auditory imagination, imagining sounds. On the other hand, with sensory 
substitution for the blind the internal mental representations may be, but
need 
not be, truly visual in terms of quasi-pictorial or "screen-like" internal 
representations, so to leave this issue open it may be better to speak of
mental 
imagery rather than just visual imagery here. Therefore, we will mainly use
the 
mental imagery term from now on, although we use and apply it only in the 
context of vision and vision substitution.
Note that with sensory substitution for the blind the mental processing and 
experience will in fact be much less subjective than with most of the other 
forms of mental imagery, because it is again bound rather directly and
tightly 
to sensory input, though not from the eyes this time, but from a substituting 
auditory display or a tactile (haptic) display. The imagery content is set 
mainly by the alternative sensory input and less directly by conscious
control - 
although one can of course focus attention to parts of the perception or of
any 
corresponding short term sensory memory (sensory buffer) as well as control 
where the alternate input device is being "pointed at".
The topic and concept of mental imagery has been much discussed and debated
in 
the literature, but so far mainly in a philosophical and psychological
setting. 
This makes that although some publications do address the meaning of mental 
imagery to, for instance, the congenitally blind (e.g., John Kennedy), 
surprisingly little has been published about the relevant mental imagery 
questions as now posed by new technology options for substituting one sensory 
stream by another. This is most unfortunate, because state-of-the-art vision 
substitution technology, based on camera or sonar sensor input and auditory
or 
tactile display output, poses very concrete and socially relevant questions 
about (the limitations of) mental imagery, and the alternate sensory
induction 
thereof, questions that should be leading to significant follow-up in 
psychological theory, prediction and experiment. See also the SIGGRAPH 98
panel 
presentation on this topic.
Historically, part of the debate on mental imagery has circled around the 
behaviorist criticism on the non-provable existence of subjective experiences 
(e.g., Watson). With modern brain-scanning techniques like PET and fMRI,
which 
show increasingly reliable correlates between the subjective and the
objective, 
this fundamental scientific criticism starts to lose ground. Another source
of 
much debate has been the concept of quasi-pictorial or "screen-like" visual 
imagery as a (conscious) experience, "versus" or supplemented by the
underlying 
(partly non-conscious) visual processing and representation needed to do the 
coding or decoding (notably Stephen Kosslyn). It seems likely that
neuroscience 
will help disentangle these issues in the forthcoming years, and help clarify 
which ideas and categories turn out to be mainly conceptual artefacts of
culture 
and philosophy, and which ideas can be demonstrated to have a locatable
neural 
substrate. For instance, the relations and distinctions between short term 
visual memory (iconic memory) and spatial processing with its working
memory (as 
used in navigation) are currently subject to intensive neuroscientific
research.
The vOICe vision substitution technology, as presented on this web site, is 
about a proposed new mental imagery approach via sound-induced
visualisation or 
"perceptualization", for which real-time hardware has been developed, as
well as 
a multimodal Java applet demonstrator and fully integrated video sonification 
software in the form of The vOICe Learning Edition. Having been developed
as an 
experimental system for auditory image representations, it is intended as a
step 
towards a vision substitution device for the blind. Presently, The vOICe
offers 
a first order approach consistent with basic psychophysical knowledge about
the 
human hearing system, while containing a sufficiently large set of
parameters to 
allow for much of the subsequent second order fine-tuning for improved 
perceptual performance as more knowledge about human auditory processing and 
perception becomes available. See also the auditory model page. The big
question 
in the context of mental imagery is to what extent The vOICe approach can
indeed 
be used to replace regular vision via sound-induced mental imagery.

Sound-induced mental imagery of visual information 
Literature on The vOICe approach: Meijer, P.B.L., ``An Experimental System
for 
Auditory Image Representations,'' IEEE Transactions on Biomedical
Engineering, 
Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 112-121, Feb 1992. Reprinted in the 1993 IMIA Yearbook of 
Medical Informatics, pp. 291-300. Electronic version of full paper available 
on-line. 

A good entry point to mental imagery and its history in science, including
many 
references, is the web site of Nigel Thomas on Mental Imagery, Consciousness, 
and Cognition. For more information on The vOICe technology, visit The vOICe 
Home Page. 
Copyright © 1996 - 1999 Peter B.L. Meijer


Scott D. Hendershot
Media, Pennsylvania
[log in to unmask]


VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
To join or leave the list, send a message to
[log in to unmask]  In the body of the message, simply type
"subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
 VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/vicug-l.html


ATOM RSS1 RSS2