Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 25 Sep 1999 22:26:13 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-cc: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> From: Don Wiss <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Abstracts posted in a newsgroup
> Subject: The Myth of the Paleolithic Diet Exposed!
>
> ... hominoid primates are largely vegetarian,
But not all HPs are human.
> current hunter-gatherer groups rely on foods that can be
> obtained most conveniently,
I smell truisms in the air. I seldom see HGs at the corner store.
> ...Most evidence suggests
> that a shift to largely plant-based diets would reduce chronic disease
> risks among industrialized and rapidly-industrializing populations.
This author must be selective in his/her evidence-gathering. The folks
reading PALEOFOOD and posting to alt.support.diet.paleolithic already
know what a largely plant-based diet does to one's health. The author
needs to get out more.
>
> [To] accomplish this shift, it will be necessary to overcome market-place
> barriers and to develop new policies that will encourage greater
> consumption of fruits, vegetables and grains as a means to promote public
> health.
"Develop new policies"? Does this mean I can expect jack-booted
government thugs from the FDA breaking down my door, wresting the
pork chop from my jaws and jamming oatmeal (shudder) down my throat ;-> ??
This agendized, pro-Neolithic/agriculturalist paper is typical
of what can be found in a mainstream "nutritionist" journal.
It is just an opinion-editorial piece masquerading as scientific inquiry.
Thanks for the entertainment, Don.
|
|
|