PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Kent Multer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Aug 1999 16:39:05 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
>>  And (2) it's mostly sugar, which as we know, is not
>> something you want to
>> eat a lot of in any form, especially highly
>> concentrated ones.
>
>You're probably right. But I think we'd probably all
>agree it would be preferable to refined table sugar.

I don't think so.  My understanding is that all sugars are pretty much the
same: carbohydrates.  If its name ends in "-ose," it's something you don't
want to eat a lot of.

However, this is not something I'm expert on.  Anyone else care to comment?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2