Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 19 May 1999 16:57:55 -0700 |
In-Reply-To: |
<Pine.GSO.3.96.990519190839.9868B-100000@polaris> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>> Optimal foraging theory pretty much rules out the use of things like grains
>> in all but the leanest of times.
I believe that there's a big difference between flax seed and grains.
Grains are inedible raw, and when dried are hard. They have a lot of
starch and are low in oil.
Flax seed is excellent uncooked, easily gathered, and is rich with a
good oil. It gives a good return in calories compared to unimproved
grains. Ever seen teff? Almost as fine as dust. Yet in Ethiopia it's
considered a food crop.
When unimproved grains fall to the ground it's a drawback, especially
since they're so small. Flax stays in the seed casing, where it can be
found easily. Also, flax provides a good fiber for cordage.
Most of these questions can never be answered, but it's easy to imagine
our distant hunter-gatherer forbears liking flax. It also grows in
northern climates, and tolerates heavy wet ground, which is why it used
to be a major crop in Oregon, before the synthetics replaced linen.
Susan Kline
|
|
|