PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Mar 2000 08:47:01 -0500
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Organization:
Optexinc
From:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Thanks for responding Amadeus,

> Not to?

Yes, I am interested in any solid evidence against brewer's yeast. I already
know it is good for the reasons you mention. It is also a good source of
chromium. However I want to give the paleo view the benefit of the doubt
here.

I think yeast is present in nature on the surfaces of plants but I suppose
the quantity is too low to justify inclusion in the default paleodiet. I
would hope the paleo position would also be justifiable in purely scientific
terms.

> Big amounts of foreign genes are said to promote allergies.

Hmm, have you seen any scientific research to support the idea that the
large amounts of DNA in yeast could promote allergies? I believe DNA (or
RNA) is present in every cell of every living thing.

I know brewer's yeast is approximately 50% protein, which is one reason I am
interested in adding it back to my diet. I want to use it as a natural
high-protein weight training supplement in lieu of whey protein powder which
is a processed dairy product.

-gts

ATOM RSS1 RSS2