Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PCBUILD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PCBUILD Home PCBUILD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: coppermine
From:
Sami Al_mohssen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:40:43 +0300
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (17 lines)
> The name coppermine comes from the fact that they are using copper for
> internal chip connections instead of aluminum.  Copper is a much better
> conductor than aluminum, which means that the resistance to electric current
> is less, which means that less heat is produced.  The same current that
> passes through an aluminum wire can pass through a copper one that is
> smaller in diameter faster.  The problem in the past with using copper was
> that it corroded too easily during manufacturing.  That problem has been
> solved.
>
i think Intel will use copper in 2000 not is the new coppermine chipset.
the name segests otherwise but i'm sure the name has nothing to do with
copper.

                Curious about the people moderating your
                   messages? Visit our staff web site:
                     http://nospin.com/pc/staff.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV