In a message dated 5/3/99 7:10:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
> State budgetary restrictions were not a defense, the appeals court said,
> unless the cost of compliance was "so unreasonable given the demands of the
> state's mental health budget that it would fundamentally alter the service
> it provides."
if we can afford to bomb the serbs, we can surely afford to fund community
based group homes and other solutions. it's just a matter of Will.
mag