PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Jun Qian <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Jul 1999 23:37:42 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
No. the block size will stay at 4K. However, put data file on a separate
partition is much safer idea.

J Qian

Uzi Paz wrote:

> On my win95a (there is no Hebrew enabled Win95b) one of the reasons
> of making smaller partitions was to make block size small so that there
> will be no much wasted space due to the fact that each file must use
> integer number of blocks.
>
> With the 32bit FAT that I'm going to use in w98, is block size still a
> factor?

                         PCBUILD's List Owner's:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                       Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2