BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"BP - \"The Cracked Monitor\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Why are Some Buildings More Interesting Than Oth
From:
Ken Follett <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Sep 1999 14:15:51 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"BP - \"The Cracked Monitor\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
In a message dated 9/22/99 12:16:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

> But since I'm not a Harvard-trained architectural theorist, I wouldn't
> suppose my opinion might count.

Heidi,

Your opinion counts for me.
For one, the Harvard trained theorist is not hands-on and is not on BP.
For another, I agree that buildings are subject to public interpretation.
What a few individuals think of them is irrelevant from the perspective of
the building.

][<en

ATOM RSS1 RSS2