BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"BP - \"That's gneiss but I think you're full of schist!\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Roofing conundrum
From:
Mike Devonshire <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 Jul 1999 22:00:24 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"BP - \"That's gneiss but I think you're full of schist!\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
In a message dated 7/18/99 1:17:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<< I think the LCC is probably easier to repair in the future than the TCSS.
>>
Ralph-

I don't think any contractor wants to work with TCSS, however, I think that
proper detailing and careful supervision will ensure longevity. I am not sure
we will see much LCC in the future. As I understand it the stuff is being
discontinued in favor of the new "Rhinemetal" materials. ( a Revere guy I
spoke with said it had to do with lead liability issues) Afraid you, as well
as the rest of us, are up sheet creek my friend.
I love LCC, but I would go with the TCSS.

Twybil

ATOM RSS1 RSS2