Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 17 Jul 1998 18:51:32 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
According to my nutrition course, some research has shown that the
pasteurization process modifies the milk in such a way as to promote heart
disease. I do not remember the details. So it is possible that raw milk
would be okay.
Scott
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paleolithic Eating Support List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Todd Moody
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 1998 1:47 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [P-F] beef
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Ray Audette wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 98-07-15 07:22:03 EDT, you write:
> > > << Either milk,
> > > which the Samburu make extensive use of, is not so bad, or the
> > > Samburu represent a local adaptation. If the latter, then their
> > > experience with milk *and* beef cannot be generalized to the rest
> > > of us. >>
> >
> > We are only talking about coronary health. These people have all of the
> > other problems associated with milk consumption. Pastoral people are
> > neolithic and not as healthy as paleolithic people.
>
> What health problems are you referring to here? Usually it is
> precisely coronary health that is linked to milk consumption
> (e.g., by Loren Cordain), with the exception of lactose
> intolerance.
|
|
|