PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Jul 1999 11:22:27 +0300
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
Re: Logical drive allocation
From:
Uzi Paz <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
On my win95a (there is no Hebrew enabled Win95b) one of the reasons
of making smaller partitions was to make block size small so that there
will be no much wasted space due to the fact that each file must use
integer number of blocks.

With the 32bit FAT that I'm going to use in w98, is block size still a
factor?

Uzi

                         PCBUILD's List Owner's:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                       Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2