PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jun Qian <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 6 Jun 1999 23:36:06 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
I've done xcopy about 45 times now. No problem has been reported yet. But
after I read the risk, I do agree that after xcopy, a full check should be
done to ensure everything is ok (that is what I always do). I'll not recommand
to do xcopy, but I don't agree the "unsafe for all" issue. At least, under
careful check and plan, xcopy is safe.

J Qian

Earl Truss wrote:

> At 04:46 PM 6/4/99 -0400, you wrote:
> >The possibility of loosing data using defrag due to a power failure
> >without a UPS is greater than having xcopy cause a problem. And yet I
>
> Do you have any statistics to support this claim?  I've never seen a power
> failure while using defrag but I HAVE seen this problem with using XCOPY
> more than once.

               PCBUILD mailing list is brought to you by:
                            The NOSPIN Group
                            http://nospin.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2