A slant or free speech.

Are some people and organizations subject to more restriction than others?

If a news organization reports something that is not true, should they be
held more accountable than an individual making the same error?

What about a person posting a message to a discussion group.

Do they have they right or a responsible to verify and be neutral?

Where are the lines to be drawn?


F. Leon

- - -                                                               - - -
- - - Please cut/remove the balance of this message before replying - - -
- - -                                                               - - -


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 23:54:29 -0400
From: FAIR <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [FAIR-L] Study Shows Nightline, NewsHour Slant on Yugoslavia Bombing


                                 FAIR-L
                    Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting
               Media analysis, critiques and news reports

FAIR Press Release: Study Shows Nightline, NewsHour Slant on Yugoslavia
Bombing

May 6, 1999

In the first two weeks of the bombing of Yugoslavia, ABC's Nightline and
PBS's NewsHour showed a strong imbalance toward supporters of NATO
airstrikes, according to a study by the media watch group FAIR.

Of 291 sources that appeared on the two shows from March 25 to April 8,
only 24 -- or 8 percent -- were critics of the NATO airstrikes. Critics
were 10 percent of sources on the NewsHour, and only 5 percent on
Nightline. Only four critics appeared live as interview guests on the
shows, 6 percent of all live discussion guests.  Just one critic appeared
as a live guest on Nightline during the entire two-week time period.

FAIR's survey was based on transcripts from the Nexis database, and
included both guests who were interviewed live and sources who spoke on
taped segments.  Sources were classified according to the institution or
group they represented, and by the opinions they expressed on NATO's
military involvement in Yugoslavia.

Other findings of the study included:

* Forty-five percent of sources were current or former U.S. government and
military officials, NATO representatives or NATO troops.  On Nightline,
this group accounted for a majority of sources (55 percent).

* Yugoslavian government officials, Serbians and Serbian-Americans
accounted for only 6 percent of sources on the NewsHour and 9 percent on
Nightline.  Only two of these sources appeared as live interviewees.

* On Nightline, no American sources other than Serbian-Americans
criticized NATO's airstrikes.

* Think tank scholars, professors and other academic experts made up only
2 percent of sources on the NewsHour and 5 percent on Nightline. Only two
experts appeared on live interviews on the NewsHour, and none was
interviewed live on Nightline.  None of these experts were critical of the
NATO bombing.

The complete report is available on FAIR's website at:
<http://www.fair.org/reports/kosovo-sources.html>

Contact: Steve Rendall <mailto:[log in to unmask]>


For more on the war in Yugoslavia, go to:
<http://www.fair.org/international/yugoslavia.html>