Out of the cites below from Wm Meecham, I see nothing that warrants the
assault you heaped upon him. Please refrain from this nonsense. Or, as you
put it, (see last 4 words, infra).

DDeBar
[log in to unmask]

----------
> From: Matt Hill <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CHOMSKY] Znet: How to respond to NATO advocates. CWL's
> Date: Thursday, April 22, 1999 7:29 PM
>
> William Meecham lied:
> > A. Cockburn this morning deconstructs the all too frequent
> > support for US attack on Yugoslavia; he correctly notes that
> > this is deja vu all over again; the same response was
> > endemic during almost all of the Viet Nam slaughter.
> >
> > C. notes that these CWL's (cold war liberals) revel in
> > bombing, especially bombing socialists but one can say more:
> > they carry water for the empire or put another way are fully
> > aware of bread and where it is buttered;
>
> [snipped my text, none of which William addressed]
>
> William,
>
> Do you have anything substantive to contribute, or is your only role
> here to spread barefaced lies?
>
> 1. I do not support the bombing.
>
> 2. I am NOT a "cold war liberal."
>
> 3. I do not revel in bombings.
>
> In responding to my post with your derogatory comments, you lie about my
> position, lie about my feelings, and slander me by portraying me as
> something that I am not.  You did not address a single point I raised.
> You emailed me once before with your bullshit, but this time you spammed
> the list.
>
> Stop lying.  Stop spamming the list with nonsensical crap.  If you have
> something to say, say it.  Otherwise shut the fuck up.
>
>         Matt