Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 21 May 1999 17:52:39 -0700 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
><< How do you reconcile in your own logical mind the 2 following facts?
>
> 1Mother's milk is known to have low level of proteins and humans are
growing
> at the biggest rate of their life while feeding on it.
>
> 2humans adults are said to thrive on a hight protein diet.
>
> and thoses 2 other facts
>
> 1Humans milk is rich in lactose (sugar)
>
> 2Lot of adults don't do well with high carbonhydrates intake
>
> something in me is missing in me to get around that. Help!
>
> Could it mean that we need sugar to grow tissues and proteins for
> maitenance?
> >>
>
>I'm no expert on this, but right off the bat you have two completely
>different types of organism here - an actively growing infant and an adult
>that is not growing to any extent. Just this should dictate differing
>metabolic processes, no?
>Holly
thank you, the baby have a speed up metabolism compared to adult (his or her
heart beat is way quicker ) he makes me think to the hummingbird that live
at high speed their diet is flower nectar (sweet). bees are very active too
, carnivorous animals, except while hunting ,are quite lazy compared to
herbivorous...
What else i want more
Jean-claude
|
|
|