I read in Win98 Bible that they compare the speed of 3 setups:
FAT16+drivespace compressed, FAT16, FAT32. They found the first one to be
marginal faster than the FAT16 while FAT32 to be the slowest. Anyone can
verify that claim? Unfortunately, I just recently convert some of my
partitions to FAT32.
It also depends on your processor, RAM, HD speed. It probably not a good
idea with 486...
Changhsu Liu
At 09:03 PM 9/13/99 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi Group,
>My question is: Is it worth using "drive space"
>compression tool to compress a drive that is getting
>full? Does it slow down the computer? It's just a home
>desk top unit.
>Thank you,
>Gregg
>
> PCBUILD's List Owner's:
> Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
> Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>
PCBUILD's List Owner's:
Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>